Category Proportions = Research Performance (38%) + Educational Innovation (37%) + Sustainability (25%)
| Evaluation Area | Detailed Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Performance (38%) |
SCI-level Papers per Faculty Member | 10% | Number of SCI-level papers per full-time faculty member |
| Total External Research Grants Received | 7% | Annual total amount of external research grants | |
| Global Research Reputation | 8% | Global evaluation statistical analysis | |
| Research Funds per Faculty Member | 3% | Research funds per full-time faculty member | |
| Technology Transfer Revenue / Cases | 5% | Total revenue and number of technology transfers | |
| Number of Patent Registrations (Domestic/Overseas) | 5% | Number of patent registrations per full-time faculty member | |
| Educational Innovation (37%) |
Full-time Faculty Ratio | 8% | Ratio of full-time faculty to students |
| Global Educational Reputation | 7% | Global evaluation statistical analysis | |
| Disclosed Employment Rate | 3% | Publicly disclosed employment rate of the most recent year | |
| Sustained Employment Rate | 2% | Sustained employment rate of the most recent year | |
| Enrolled Student Fill Rate | 5% | Fill rate of quota-capacity | |
| Freshman Fill Rate | 5% | Freshman fill rate for the current year | |
| Educational Expenditure per Student | 5% | Relative comparison of student educational expenditure | |
| Scholarship per Student | 2% | Institutional scholarship per student | |
| Sustainability (25%) |
University Brand Survey Evaluation | 10% | University brand evaluation results of the current year |
| Student Dropout Rate | 5% | Enrolled student satisfaction index | |
| University Sustainability (ESG) | 5% | Global evaluation statistical analysis | |
| International Student Ratio | 3% | Sustainable internationalization | |
| International Faculty Ratio | 2% | Global partnership | |
| Total | 100% | Fair evaluation management by University Evaluation Committee |
After collecting big data, it is checked based on six criteria: completeness, consistency, accuracy, uniqueness, validity, and timeliness to ensure no information is missing or contradictory, matches actual figures, is not duplicated, has valid meaning, and is up-to-date. By utilizing Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω, the consistency and reliability of detailed indicators are verified. This ensures that Research Performance, Education Innovation, and Sustainability all fully capture the original evaluation purpose, enabling the production of highly reliable evaluation results.